Flashpoints

1 Year On: Evaluating the Impact of the Camp David Summit on Japan-South Korea-US Relations

Recent Features

Flashpoints | Security | East Asia

1 Year On: Evaluating the Impact of the Camp David Summit on Japan-South Korea-US Relations

What progress has been made on implementing the summit’s outcomes, and what are the implications for future trilateral cooperation?

1 Year On: Evaluating the Impact of the Camp David Summit on Japan-South Korea-US Relations

From left: South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, U.S. President Joe Biden, and Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio pose for a photograph before their trilateral meeting at Laurel Cabin at Camp David, Maryland, U.S., Aug. 18, 2023.

Credit: Official White House Photo by Erin Scott

The one-year anniversary of the historic Camp David meeting between Japan, South Korea, and the United States offers a timely opportunity to reflect on the strategic significance and lasting impacts of this trilateral summit. Held on August 18, 2023, the meeting marked a pivotal moment in Northeast Asian geopolitics, as the leaders of the three nations – President Yoon Suk-yeol of South Korea, Prime Minister Kishida Fumio of Japan, and President Joe Biden of the United States – reaffirmed their commitment to a closer trilateral partnership amid rising regional and global challenges. One year later, what progress has been made on the “Camp David Spirit,” and what are the implications for future trilateral cooperation?

The Camp David summit – the first standalone summit between the three countries – was significant for several reasons. It symbolized a breakthrough in relations between Japan and South Korea, two countries with a complex and often contentious history. Historical disputes, particularly those stemming from Japan’s colonial occupation of Korea, have long strained bilateral relations. However, the summit highlighted a shared recognition of the need to move beyond these historical grievances in the face of common security threats, particularly from North Korea and the broader strategic competition with China.

During the summit, the three leaders agreed on several key initiatives aimed at strengthening trilateral cooperation. These included commitments to enhance joint military exercises, increase intelligence sharing, and deepen economic ties. Additionally, the summit produced a joint statement that emphasized the importance of a free and open Indo-Pacific, underscoring the trilateral alliance’s role in maintaining regional stability and countering China’s growing influence.

In the year since the Camp David summit, significant progress has been made in advancing the goals outlined during the meeting. On the security front, South Korea, Japan, and the United States have conducted more frequent and sophisticated joint military exercises, aimed at improving interoperability and readiness in the face of North Korean provocations. The trilateral missile defense exercises held in the Sea of Japan (also known as the East Sea) in early 2024 were a clear demonstration of this enhanced cooperation.

Intelligence sharing has also seen a marked improvement, with the three countries establishing more robust channels for exchanging information on North Korean missile tests and other regional threats. This has been particularly important given the increased frequency of North Korea’s missile launches, which underscored the urgency of a coordinated response.

Economically, the trilateral partnership has focused on reducing supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly in critical technologies such as semiconductors. South Korea and Japan, both key players in the global semiconductor industry, have worked more closely with the United States to secure supply chains and reduce dependence on China. This cooperation has extended to joint research and development initiatives, aimed at maintaining technological leadership in the face of rising competition from Chinese firms.

Despite these advances, challenges remain. While the summit signaled a willingness to move beyond historical disputes, these issues have not entirely disappeared. Domestic political pressures in both South Korea and Japan continue to influence the bilateral relationship, with nationalist sentiments occasionally resurfacing. For example, Japan’s decision to begin releasing treated wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant in 2023 reignited tensions, though both governments managed to contain the fallout diplomatically.

Moreover, the broader strategic environment in Northeast Asia remains fraught with uncertainty. China’s response to the enhanced trilateral cooperation has been predictably negative, with Beijing accusing the three countries of forming an “Asian NATO” aimed at containing China. This rhetoric has been accompanied by increased Chinese military activity in the region, including more frequent air and naval incursions into the South China Sea and the East China Sea.

Looking ahead, the Camp David summit’s legacy will depend on the ability of Japan, South Korea, and the United States to sustain and deepen their cooperation amid these challenges. The summit laid a strong foundation, but building a durable trilateral alliance will require continued political will, strategic alignment, and public support in all three countries.

One area of potential growth is in economic security cooperation. As the global economy becomes increasingly defined by competition in high-tech industries, the trilateral partnership could expand its focus on securing critical supply chains, developing next-generation technologies, and setting international standards in emerging sectors like artificial intelligence and quantum computing. Such cooperation would not only enhance the economic resilience of the three nations but also strengthen their collective influence in shaping the rules of the global economy.

On the security front, the trilateral alliance will need to remain agile in responding to the evolving threat landscape. This includes not only addressing North Korea’s missile and nuclear programs but also countering China’s assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. Enhanced maritime security cooperation, including joint patrols and exercises in contested waters, could serve as a deterrent to Chinese provocations and reinforce the commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Furthermore, the alliance must navigate the delicate balance between strengthening its deterrence capabilities and avoiding the escalation of tensions with China. Diplomatic engagement with Beijing, combined with a credible deterrence posture, will be essential to managing this balance. The trilateral alliance should also seek to engage other regional actors, such as ASEAN countries and Australia, to build a broader coalition in support of regional stability.

The Camp David summit marked a turning point in Japan-South Korea-U.S. relations, signaling a renewed commitment to trilateral cooperation in the face of shared security challenges. Over the past year, the three nations have made significant strides in enhancing their military, intelligence, and economic collaboration. However, sustaining this momentum will require continued efforts to manage historical grievances, respond to regional security threats, and adapt to an increasingly competitive global environment.

As the anniversary of the summit approaches, it is clear that the trilateral partnership is more crucial than ever for maintaining peace and stability in Northeast Asia. By building on the successes of the past year and addressing the challenges that lie ahead, Japan, South Korea, and the United States can ensure that their alliance remains a cornerstone of regional security for years to come.

Authors
Guest Author

Jihoon Yu

Jihoon Yu is a research fellow at the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses. He was a member of Task Forces for South Korea’s light aircraft carrier project and Jangbogo-III submarine project. He is the main author of the ROK Navy’s Navy Vision 2045. His area of expertise includes the ROK-US alliance, the ROK-Europe security cooperation, Inter-Korean relations, national security, maritime security, hybrid-threats and strategic weapons systems. He earned his BA in International Relations from the ROK Naval Academy, MA in National Security Affairs from the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School and Ph.D. in Political Science from Syracuse University.

Tags